If you're watching this movie
with the expectation of seeing the clash of an Asian-American
following his dreams versus traditional Tiger Parenting, you're in
for a disappointment. You learn that Dave inherits his love of art from his
father, who also wanted to grow up to be an artist, but because of
his circumstances, he leaves for the Korean War and when he comes
home, his parents burn all of his drawings to deter him from
pursuing his dream- and that's about it when it comes to Asian issues. Dave's father notices his son's talent and
passion and is supportive of Dave's career choice. The first half is
pretty much a montage of Dave running around causing trouble and
notable people acknowledging his talent from the get go as well as
his early struggles and success as an artist as well as his
adventures during the L.A. riots.
The turning point is of course,
is when he goes to jail in Japan. Again, it is reconfirmed that David
is a true artist at heart and making him stop drawing is like making
him commit suicide. This is where he rediscovers God and he comes
out a new man... sort of. He contemplates his life and tries to do
good in the world and you get the impression that he's genuinely
trying to change, but at the end of the day, he admits that while having
achieved his dreams and most likely because of that, he never really grows up.
So beautiful- and catchy name too
Impressions: I think the movie is somewhat over hyped. I think they overstretched some
parts in the beginning where they were talking about his childhood
but that's probably because the trailer makes it sound like they were
going to talk about his time in jail for the bulk of the documentary.
They never really talk about his time in art school and whether or
not it had much of a big impact in his life. I'm assuming since it
wasn't featured it's not that much of a big deal- or at least in the
eyes of the creators, but it's something that I would have liked to
know about since I'm only taking art as a hobby and would like to
know what a legit art school is like. Also, the way the movie
progresses really leaves to question exactly how he rises to success.
They talk about how he lands all these jobs, but you never quite
understand how they all connect with each other in his rise to fame.
To be honest, I actually watched/heard an interview that he had with
Howard Stern (which I will post later) where he talks more about his
success and his time in prison in more detail. I suggest watching the
interview after the documentary since it helps supplements some of
the holes that the film leaves hanging.
Having watched the Howard Stern
interview first, I kind of got the impression that David is this dysfunctional, genuine kind of artist. Towards the end of the
documentary however, you learn that Dave is diagnosed with clinical
depression, OCD, antisocial behavior, bipolar disorder, kleptomania
and sex addiction and when you add that up along with his refined
skill, you get a fucked up, crazy-talented artist and you realize that he's more
of a genuinely dysfunctional character (that can draw like a
motherfucker).
But you know what? Despite his talent,
his financial success, and the closeness of his inner circle (you can tell by how fond they are with him in the audio commentary), he's
still far from a perfect person (besides his mental diagnosis). There
are cut scenes where his loved ones question his after-jail epiphany
and they admit that he's still "pretty much the same guy".
The first scene takes place with David and his friends in the Congo
talking about looking for "dinosaurs" somewhere in the
jungle and you're like "Dude, wtf are you doing in Africa
looking for dinosaurs?" but in the end, he admits that the
dinosaurs are really a metaphor for himself. He gets disillusioned with
everyday life just like the rest of us and has to escape every three
months from the rat-race we call life. He questions how many times he
has to leave to stay humbled- which is a sign to me that he at least
recognizes his faults.
I think the part that really hits
home for me was how he justifies selling his work for tens of
thousands of dollars. (That and the time he felt betrayed by his
friend and contemplates murdering said friend. At this point of the
movie, I'm on the couch eating cereal and Dave starts talking about
how he's going to murder the guy and I feel my own rage building up and
I'm waving my spoon around yelling “YOU FUCK HIM UP, DAVE!” at
the television. Yeah.. I'm kind of bitter, can you tell?) Aaanyways,
he justifies this by saying that each piece is a little piece of his
soul. He fears that with every little line he draws, it uses up a bit
of what's left inside of him- that there is a finite amount of art in
him and he's going to keep going until that tank runs out. You know
what, guys? That applies to all of us- as well and it makes me
question how much our lives are really worth: Minimum wage? Or six
figures and up? He's lucky enough to be the latter- and he is in high
demand.
All in all, David Choe is one hell of
a character. You may or may not like his art or lifestyle, but his raw talent, emotion and persona makes him undeniable. He's achieved a freedom that most of us can only dream of
and despite his personal flaws (he's definitely not someone
you want your kids to have as a role model), he doesn't seem like
that bad of a guy- he's just trying to get his act together like rest of us and I would definitely recommend watching it.
Especially if you were stuck in a rut like I was.
Dave, I really hope you find that
dinosaur, man.
Yeah... not even close lol....

5 comments:
Nice review. Every time I watch David Choe, half the time I think he's a crazy charismatic genius and the other half I think he's a crazy asshole.
Lol yeah... either way he's still a genius though. God I wish I was that good though lol
Hey Tommy I just noticed this! Interesting review and Choe sounds like a true character. If you look at the lives of some of the world's greatest artists you'll find that the vast majority of them were dysfunctional in some way or another - almost like they had to become artists because they couldn't fit into any other lifestyle. I think Picasso was a sex-maniac, and Pollock also suffered from depression, bi-polar (I think!), and sex addiction.
It's also nice to see that Choe isn't pushing the tired narrative of "overcoming strict Asian parenting to become a freer more enlightened being".
Hey Ben! I actually forgot to mention that even though I linked to your LA riots page, there wasn't actually any racist tones about it. Just him rampaging with everyone else.
I remember reading an article a while back saying how "creative" people have sex more often than non-creative people, but I wonder if it means that creative people are more attractive as well...?
I think judging from his personality, he wouldn't even care what his parents told him, he'd probably just do it anyway.
It's also nice to see that Choe isn't pushing the tired narrative of "overcoming strict Asian parenting to become a freer more enlightened being".
Well, it's a tired narrative for a reason, because this is what a lot of Asian Americans had to deal with growing up: Destroy and Rebuild.
the reason creative people have more sex is not because they're more physically attractive. it's because they're more open to possibilities and don't adhere to boundaries. why limit yourself? artistic types go by feeling and emotion, not rules or convention.
Post a Comment